Resource Relatedness, Redeployability, and Firm Value - Arkadiy Sakhartov
In-class exercise
Consider a firm that enters the model having been previously focused on industry i: the firm operated a unit of resources in industry i. In the remaining three periods of the resources’ useful life, that unit can be used in two industries, i and j. In the first period, the use of all resources in industry i would generate certain net cash flow Ci=10; whereas the use of all resources in industry j would generate certain net cash flow Cj=10. In the second and the third periods, the net cash flow for a unit of resources is uncertain in industry j: it follows the binomial process specified in the Excel spreadsheet; whereas the net cash flow for the unit of resources deployed in industry i is certain and grows with the risk-free interest rate r=0.1, also as shown in the linked Excel spreadsheet. (https://www.dropbox.com/s/lju09fn709trfpw/Numerical%20illustration%20of%20redeployment%20%28assignment%29.xlsx?dl=0)
In each of the three periods, the firm can use redeployability of its resources: it can withdraw the whole unit or a half of a unit of resources from one industry and redeploy them to another industry. If the firm uses only a half of resources in an industry, the cash flow generated in that industry is also halved. Resource redeployment is costly with total costs determined by: (a) the dissimilarity (unrelatedness) of resource requirements between i and j that is operationalized as S=1, and (b) the amount of redeployed resources. In particular, if all (or a half of) resources are redeployed to i or to j, the firm pays the redeployment cost equal S (or 0.5S).
Compute: (a) the expected discounted net present value VR of the firm when redeployability is present; (b) the expected discounted net present value V of the firm when redeployability is absent; and (c) the expected discounted net present value of resource redeployability R.
Background Materials: Readings
Sakhartov AV, Folta TB. 2014. Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management Journal 35(12): 1781‒1797.
Sakhartov AV, Folta TB. 2015. Getting beyond relatedness as a driver of corporate value. Strategic Management Journal 36(13): 1939‒1959.
Background Materials: Videos
Background Materials: Slides